Restoring or replacing brownstone windows

Experts say it’s worth saving and restoring well-preserved brownstone windows. (Photo by Susan De Vries)

BY LIZ SADLER CRYAN | Tall, narrow windows are one of the defining characteristics of a brownstone, and for some lucky homeowners, the century-old wood windows remain intact. Often, old windows can be restored to their original condition. Other times, they need to be replaced.

So, how do you know if your wood windows are worth saving?

“Anybody that does this can look at a sash and say with pretty good certainty whether it’s original or not, just by the joinery,” said Peter Madias of Method Restoration, a window restoration company. “Another giveaway is when you see the weights and chains.”

Old windows have certain joints — like mortise and tenon joints and bridle joints — that mass-produced windows don’t have, and are typically made from old-growth fir, Madias said. He restores single-pane windows by removing them and repairing them in his Brooklyn shop. On-site work is also required to repair the window opening.

“It’s not cheap because it’s very skilled work and labor intensive,” Madias explained. “I would always recommend restoring the windows. I’m a little biased. It really depends on the client — and if they want to preserve what’s lasted for a century or more, or do they want to be the one to throw it in a dumpster?”

While restoring oversize parlor windows may be a job best left to the professionals, do-it-yourself types eager to tackle smaller window projects may want to consult one of the many books on the subject. “Working Windows” and “The Window Sash Bible” are just two of the classics.

Old brownstone windows were made to last longer than todays’ models. (Photo by Susan De Vries)

Old windows are made to last longer, Madias noted.

“You go with a big company and they rot,” he said. “I’ve seen 10-to-12-year-old windows rot. And I’ve seen 160-year-old windows that look like they were made yesterday.”

“Windows are among the most significant features of a
landmark building,” according to the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission’s guide to window repair and restoration. If new windows are necessary, homeowners in a landmarked district must apply for a Certificate of No Effect (C.N.E.).

“That means you’re going to put back what was originally there, you’re ripping everything down to the original masonry opening, and you have to match brick-mold profiles and details,” said Ernie Cappello of WindowFix.

Prices for high-quality, floor-to-ceiling new windows, such as would be found on the parlor level of a brownstone, start around $2,500, including installation — but can run up to $7,500 for windows with curved openings. Cappello recommends the brands Marvin, Kolbe and Parrett.

“They’re all custom, high-performance windows,” he said. “I do whichever ones fit my clients’ needs. There’s a lot of little nuances.”

For the budget-conscious, Cappello recommends the double-hung sash kit by Sierra Pacific. If your existing frames are in good condition, new sashes are sized to fit your existing opening, and start at $1,500. More run-of-the-mill aluminum windows in smaller sizes, from mid-priced companies such as Champion, might be more suitable for the rear of a house in a landmark district, and average about $500 each installed.

New windows are an investment that should last up to 40 years, Cappello stated.

“I recommend you file for the whole front. It lasts nine years,” he said. “I have clients that hire me, and once a year I do a floor.”

Some companies also make custom reproduction windows that are exact copies of the originals, but at a steep price. Architect Joseph Koelbel had custom double-hung windows with counterweights made for a project in Chelsea. But usually, he opts for Marvin windows.

“New windows have better insulation and reduce air infiltration,” Koelbel said. And yet, storm windows (interior or exterior) on top of properly maintained old windows can be even more energy efficient and cozy than new windows without storm windows.

“If they are really original windows and they’re high quality, then it make sense to restore them,” he stressed. “But if they’re not high quality or they were replaced in the 1970s, then it does make sense.”

This article first ran in Brownstoner, a sister Schneps Media publication of The Villager.

One Response to Restoring or replacing brownstone windows

  1. The brownstone on right in first photo must’ve had window renovation before Historic/Landmark neighborhoods were created. It isn’t bad enough that smaller windows were inserted, painting them white emphasizes the ugliness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *