Projects must house more homeless: Activists

BY ALEJANDRA O’CONNELL-DOMENECH | The pews at the Church of the Village were filled last Thursday with advocates calling for more homeless housing in the city. Many of them were themselves homeless.

The occasion was a town hall organized by House Our Future NY, an advocacy campaign formed by the Coalition for the Homeless and 63 other organizations. Attendees called on Mayor Bill de Blasio to increase the number of units for homeless New Yorkers in his Housing New York 2.0 plan from 15,000 to 30,000, with 24,000 of those apartments to come from new construction.

A homeless advocate at the forum at Church of the Village. (Photo by Alejandra O’Connell-Domench)

In the view of the activists, although the city has made progress in terms of homeless services, de Blasio has repeatedly neglected the city’s neediest.

“We want it mandated: We want it to say, ‘homeless people coming from shelters,’” said Nathylin Flowers Adesegun.

Adesegun, 73, is an activist with VOCAL-NY who became homeless three years ago after being evicted from her rent-controlled Flatbush apartment. She made headlines last year when she confronted the mayor about his affordable housing plan during his daily workout at the Prospect Park YMCA.

California has the most homeless people of any state, with 30 percent of the U.S. homeless population. But New York City has the most homeless people — 78,767 — of any U.S. city, according to a 2018 study from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The study found that the number of the homeless in the city increased by 2,394 people last year. The city also experienced the largest overall increase in homelessness between 2007 and 2018, 46 percent, in the country, the study found.

“We are going to break this cycle,” Adesegun said.

The advocate is confident new legislation by Bronx Councilmember Rafael Salamanca Jr. will help solve the city’s homelessness issue.

The bill would apply to developers doing either new construction or renovation, for projects involving more than 15 units, and who are receiving some sort of government funding or incentives for the projects. The developers would have to set aside at least 15 units for homeless individuals for families.

So far, 35 city councilmembers support Salamanca’s bill, which means even if de Blasio vetoes it, it could still become law.

But it is unclear when a vote on the bill would occur Salamanca told this paper.

In the meantime, there is still more work to be done. Salamanca wants to ensure that supportive services for the homeless can be attached to the bill — so that, when homeless people get housing, they can stay in it.

According to Salamanca, supportive services could include financial education and rehabilitative services for those suffering from substance abuse disorders.

“Is it going to resolve homelessness? Absolutely not,” he said of the bill as it is now. “But is going to make a dent in homelessness,” he assured.

According to the councilmember, now that two-thirds of the city councilmembers are onboard with his bill, the city’s Department of Homeless Services and Department of Housing Preservation and Development are open to speaking with him about finding a way to finance supportive services. Salamanca was scheduled to meet with H.P.D. on Wed., March 13.

De Blasio’s current housing policy, Housing New York 2.0, calls for the creation and preservation of 300,000 affordable units, of which 5 percent, or 15,000, are to be set aside for the homeless. The mayor has said he is strongly against increasing the 5 percent set-aside.

2 Responses to Projects must house more homeless: Activists

  1. It is a disgrace that this City, my hometown, refuses to allot monies for the homeless or for NYCHA housing repairs, like heat and hot water, falling ceilings. They say there's no money. BS. The City and State has allocated multi-multi millions for a massive new Museum for the AMNH which is destroying a beautiful park, the Teddy Roosevelt Park, which is not only in an historic district, but is on the National Register as well. The new building, which will have the name Richard Gilder (a financier,i.e., a stockbroker) knows less science than I do, and will his name carved in pink marble and is supposed to teach science to children and for PhDs. Gilder has announced at one point that he believes "man has conquered nature." He is on the Board of Trustees as is Rebekah Mercer, a billionaire, who voted for Trump. She is involved financially and in many organizations famous for their climate change denial and the money making industry of canning PCO 2 emissions. People of this caliber will set the agenda for the Center's academics. Would you trust your child to study at such a school? Another indication that not only NYC, but the rest of the country is going down the tubes and too fast. Please vote in the upcoming 2020 election and let's clean house of these rogues.

  2. “A lot of it has to do with polarization has come from what has now become the almost criminalization of political candidates. We’re no longer content to disagree with them. We want to destroy them. And it’s a real tragic by product of the political process… No longer is it enough to say that person’s tax policies are going to hurt the country and you ought to try mine. Now it’s that person is a lying cheating weasel and probably doesn’t spend time with his wife and cheat on his kids… I do worry that we’ve lost the capacity to have a disagreement without just being disagreeable. On my show I want to have honest civil conversations with people who are polar opposite of me. Do unto others and you would have them do unto you… ” front-reviews

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *